Skip to main content

Active Crown Fire Behavior

  1. Definitions
  2. Active Crown Fire Rate of Spread and Flame Length
  3. Estimating Active Crown Fire Spread Rate With Surface Shrub Models

Definitions

Crown Fraction Burned (CFB) is a theoretical concept that is used to model and classify crown fire. It may be observable after the fact in burn severity assessments.

Image
This graph compares Crown Fire spread rates utilizing several surface shrub fuel models and compares them to the Rothermel Crown Fire Spread Model.

Passive Crown Fire (Intermittent or Persistent Torching) occurs where surface fire intensity is sufficient to ignite tree crowns, individually or in groups, but winds are not sufficient to support propagation from tree to tree. CFB between 0.10 and 0.90.

Active Crown Fire occurs where surface and crown fire energy are linked. Surface intensity is sufficient to ignite tree crowns, and fire spread and intensity in the tree crowns encourages surface fire spread and intensity. CFB at least 0.90.

Independent Crown Fire occurs (rarely) where tree crown loading and flammability is sufficient to carry fire without surface fire contribution under ambient weather and wind conditions. CFB generally approaching 1.0.

Isolated Tree Torching should not be considered crown fire, though it may be an indicator of potential later in the burn period. It usually occurs due to anomalies in surface fire behavior due to jackpots of surface fuel, isolated terrain features, or brief wind gusts. CFB is less than 0.10.

Return to Top

Active Crown Fire Rate of Spread and Flame Length

After the 1988 fire season, Rothermel (1991) developed an empirical model for estimating crown fire spread rates and fireline intensities, referencing several fires from the Rocky Mountains in its development. Based on fire behavior in Fuel Model 10 (FB10), the calculation is essentially:

ROSActiveCrownFire = 3.34*ROSFuelModel10

(Assuming MFWS = 20ft windspeed*0.4)

These graphs, using season, slope, and 20ft windspeed, provide rough estimates of active crown fire spread rates using the Rothermel Crown Fire Spread model.

No Slope

Image
Using the season of the year and the 20-ft windspeed, this graph helps the analyst estimate crown fire spread rate for fires on generally level or low slope landscapes.

50% Slope

Image
Using the season of the year and the 20-ft windspeed, this graph helps the analyst estimate crown fire spread rate for fires on steep slopes of approximately 50%.

100% Slope

Image
Using the season of the year and the 20-ft windspeed, this graph helps the analyst estimate crown fire spread rate for fires on steep slopes of approximately 100%.

Return to Top

Estimating Active Crown Fire Spread Rate with Surface Shrub Models

In fireline assessments, it may be necessary to make quick estimates of crown fire spread based on simple inputs.  Simple lookup tables or graphs like those above provide rough estimates. Anderson (1982), when describing the original 13 surface fuel models, identified several shrub models as representative of crown fire behavior in several classic types:

  • FM4 (Chaparral) for New Jersey Pine Barrens and Lake States Jack Pine.
  • FM6 (Dormant Brush) for Alaska Spruce Taiga.
  • FM7 (Southern Rough) for Alaska Black Spruce/Shrub Communities.

Bishop (2010), in developing the Fireline Assessment Method (FLAME), averaged spread rates for fuel models 5, 6, and 7 to estimate crown fire spread.

Fuel Models sh5 (145) and sh7 (147) have been used in the same manner in spatial modeling in different situations.

This graphic demonstrates the similarity in spread rates produced by the Rothermel Crown Fire Spread Rate (crown) and several surface shrub fuel models.  

Image
This graph compares Crown Fire spread rates utilizing several surface shrub fuel models and compares them to the Rothermel Crown Fire Spread Model.

Caution: Using surface fuel models to represent crown fire behavior may not accurately provide for the calculation of Crown Fraction Burned (CFB) or the modeling of increasing spread due to passive crown fire (torching and spotting) behavior in spatial fire analyses. It may also over-estimate fire spread and intensity under moderated environmental conditions.

NWCG Latest Announcements

2024 Wildland Fire Emergency Medical Service Awards

Date: May 22, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Emergency Medical Committee

The NWCG Emergency Medical Committee (EMC) is proud to announce the recipients of the 2024 Wildland Fire Emergency Medical Service Awards. Each year, EMC recognizes individuals and groups who have demonstrated exceptional actions or accomplishments that go above and beyond their normal mission or job duties.

Congratulations to all the awardees and nominees. Through leadership and initiative, they have made significant contributions to the safety and well-being of the wildland fire community. These honors are well deserved.

References:

2024 Wildland Fire EMS Awards

NWCG Emergency Medical Committee

NWCG Welcomes the Incident Management Teams Association as an Associate Member

Date: May 21, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
https://www.nwcg.gov/contact-us

The NWCG Executive Board is honored to announce that the Incident Management Teams Association (IMTA) has joined the National Wildfire Coordinating Group as an associate member.

IMTA is a dedicated group of incident management professionals committed to enhancing the profession by promoting standards and fostering collaboration across federal, state, local, Tribal, and private sector partners throughout all phases of incident management.

“Joining NWCG aligns with our mission to elevate incident management professionals nationwide,” said Dr. Randal Collins, President of IMTA. “This is a proud moment for all of us committed to advancing public safety.”

References:

Incident Management Teams Association

National Wildfire Coordinating Group

Updated NWCG Guide for Wildland Fire Modules, PMS 431

Date: May 14, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Fire Use Subcommittee

The updated NWCG Guide for Wildland Fire Modules, PMS 431 serves as a supplemental resource for wildland fire module operations, providing information frequently used in the field.

PMS 431 defines the organizational structure, staffing, and qualifications for Type 1 and Type 2 Wildland Fire Modules, outlining their roles in wildland fire suppression, prescribed fire, and resource management. The NWCG Guide for Wildland Fire Modules, PMS 431, should be used in conjunction with the NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Module Operations, PMS 430.

References:

NWCG Guide for Wildland Fire Modules, PMS 431

NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Module Operations, PMS 430

Updated NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Resource Typing, PMS 200 Now Includes Off-Highway Vehicle Typing Standards

Date: May 13, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Mobile Fire Equipment Subcommittee 

The NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Resource Typing, PMS 200 has been updated to include newly developed Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) typing standards. These standards organize OHV information into logical categories and outline key safety requirements for occupants.

NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Resource Typing, PMS 200 establishes minimum typing standards for aircraft, crews, and equipment used in national mobilization to wildland fire incidents. Typing designations are assigned based on measurable capability and performance criteria.

References:

NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Resource Typing, PMS 200