Skip to main content

Crown Fire Initiation and Propagation

  1. Introduction
  2. Crown Fire Initiation
  3. Active Crown Fire Propagation and Crowning Index (CI)
  4. Finney, Scott/Reinhardt, and Van Wagner Approaches to Crown Fire Modeling

Introduction

In the publication “Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire”, C.E. Van Wagner (1977) identified that crown fire is the interaction between separate fuel layers in forested areas.

Further, he described two processes and defined models for estimating their potential:

  • Crown Fire Initiation is an indicator of the potential for surface fire to ignite tree crown and produce either passive or active crown fire. Inputs include the gap between the surface fuels and the tree crowns (Canopy Base Height – CBH), the foliar moisture content (FMC) of the tree crowns. The result is a threshold surface fire intensity required to produce some crown fire.
  • Active Crown Fire Propagation (Crown Spread) is an indicator of the potential for continuous spread through the tree crowns. Inputs include only a characterization of the canopy fuel density in a single number. The result is a threshold rate of spread required to sustain a “solid crown flame…with associated horizontal spread.”

These models are very coarse due to the way they represent highly variable characteristics, canopy base height and canopy fuel density. Because they are so variable, their inputs represent grand averages and may require adjustment in modeling efforts.

As shown in this matrix, the Crown Fire Initiation and Active Crown Fire Propagation models work together to estimate when fires will remain as surface, when they will produce torching, or passive crown fire, behavior in the canopy, and when they will progress to active crown fires.

Linking Surface and Crown Fire Behavior

(Scott & Reinhardt, 2001)

Image
Linking Surface and Crown Fire Behavior. Essentially describes criteria for distinguishing the range of fire behavior types where forest canopies are flammable.

Use the model results from sections Crown Fire Initiation and Crown Fire Propagation to compare against estimates of surface and crown fire spread produced using anticipated environmental factors.

Return to Top

Crown Fire Initiation

These two graphs identify the height to live crowns (CBH) and the canopy foliar moisture content (FMC) as critical factors, resulting in the threshold surface fire intensity or flame length for evaluating of crown fire initiation. Use either of them to estimate minimum surface fireline intensity (FLI) or flame length (FL) that will support at least passive crown fire.

Threshold Evaluation

Use either of the two graphs below. This assessment only determines whether surface fire behavior is sufficient to initiate crown combustion. Both passive and active crown fire are possible if this threshold is met. See the criteria for active crown fire above under Linking Surface and Crown Fire Behavior to differentiate those conditions.

  • Determine the current and/or expected surface intensity (FLI or FL) for that landscape.
  • Estimate the CBH and FMC for the landscape you are evaluating for crown fire potential.
  • Lookup the threshold surface intensity from either graph here.
  • Compare the two intensities. If the projected intensity is greater than the threshold value, crown fire is expected. A ratio of projected over threshold provides a confidence value.
Image
Crown Fire Initiation; characterized as threshold surface fire intensity. Input factors are canopy base height and foliar moisture content.
Image
Crown Fire Initiation; characterized as threshold surface flame length. Input factors are canopy base height and foliar moisture content.

Return to Top

Active Crown Fire Propagation and Crowning Index (CI)

According to Van Wagner (1977), minimum threshold values for canopy fuel/bulk density (CBD) are necessary to sustain active crown fire at given spread rates. Since there is only a single crown fire fuel model, that threshold spread rate can be converted to a threshold windspeed or “crowning index” (CI).

Threshold Evaluation

The table and the graph below it provide threshold values for both ROS(active) and open 20 ft windspeed.

For a given CBD, if observed, or forecast 20 ft wind or projected ROS(active) are larger than these threshold values, sustained active crown fire is expected. A ratio of estimate/threshold provides a confidence value.

Image
Threshold for Active Crown Fire. Characterized as the crown fire spread rate needed to sustain an active crown fire, the inputs are canopy bulk density and season severity.
Image
Crowning Index: Because there is only one crown fire ‘fuel Model’ wind is the primary environmental factor for determining the threshold.

Return to Top

Finney, Scott/Reinhardt, and Van Wagner Approaches to Crown Fire Modeling

All approaches identify the threshold for predicting crown fire initiation and active crown fire spread using the same criteria, based on the Van Wagner Crown Fire Initiation and Propagation models. They diverge in the way they estimate:

  • Final spread rates for passive and active crown fire.
  • Crown Fraction Burned (CFB).
  • Final Fireline Intensity.
  • Fire Type (Surface, Passive, Active).

Both US and CFFDRS systems implement the initiation and active crown fire criteria where crown fire is anticipated. This table compare the different ways the criteria are implemented.

Model Used CFFBP Van Wagner (1977) Modeling System Surface Fire Control Finney (1998) Modeling System Crown Fire Control Scott and Reinhardt (2001) Modeling System
Surface Fire Van Wagner (1977) Integrated, empirical model Rothermel (1972) Rothermel (1972)
Crown Fire Spread Van Wagner (1977) Integrated, empirical model Rothermel (1991) Rothermel (1991)
Crown Fire (Torching) Initiation Threshold Spread Rate Van Wagner (1977) Van Wagner (1977) Van Wagner (1977)
Active Crown Fire Propagation Threshold Spread Rate Van Wagner (1977) Van Wagner (1977) Van Wagner (1977)
Methods Applied CFFBP Van Wagner (1977) Surface Fire Control Finney (1998) Crown Fire Control Scott and Reinhardt (2001)
Crown Fraction Burned Natural Log function based on the difference between estimated spread rate and Initiation Threshold spread rate. 90% when estimated spread rate is 10m/min greater than Initiation Threshold spread rate. Natural log function based on the difference between the estimated surface spread rate and the Initiation Threshold rate. 0.9 when surface spread rate reaches 90% of difference between Initiation Threshold and Active Propagation threshold. Proportionally intermediate between 0 (surface fire) and 1.0 (active Crown Fire) based on input windspeed and where it falls between windspeeds at Initiation Threshold and Active Propagation Threshold spread rates.
Passive Crown Fire Spread Integrated within basic spread model for conifer & mixedwood fuel types. Fire type designated as Passive based on estimated Crown fraction Burned (see below). Surface Fire spread rate plus any spotting spread. Based on Crown Fraction Burned (CFB). Proportionally intermediate between surface spread rate and Active Propagation threshold, based on crown fraction burned plus any spotting spread.
Final Spread Rate with Active Crown Fire Integrated within basic spread model for conifer & mixedwood fuel types Fire type designated as Passive based on estimated Crown fraction Burned (see below). Proportionally intermediate between surface spread rate and Rothermel 1991 Model based on Crown Fraction Burned. Generally, less than half of Rothermel model rate. Spread Rate estimated directly from Rothermel 1991 crown fire spread model.
Fire Intensity Byram (1959) Byram (1959) for Surface
Thomas (1963) for Crown
Byram (1959) for Surface
Thomas (1963) for Crown
Fire Type:
Surface
Passive
Active
Based on Crown Fraction Burned
<0.1 = surface
0.1 to <0.9 = passive
.9 to 1.0 = active
Based on Crown Fire Initiation and Propagation thresholds (see above)
Surface if ROS < Init. Criteria
Active if ROS > Active Crit.
Passive Between
Based on Crown Fire Initiation and Propagation thresholds (see above)
Surface if ROS < Init. Criteria
Active if ROS > Active Crit.
Passive Between

NWCG Latest Announcements

Updated NWCG Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations, PMS 515

Date: April 23, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Interagency Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Subcommittee

The NWCG Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations, PMS 515 standardizes processes and procedures for the interagency use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), including pilot inspections and approvals. This updated publication provides the aviation community with standards to ensure UAS are used safely, effectively, and efficiently in support of fire management goals and objectives.

References:

NWCG Standards for Fire Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations, PMS 515

NWCG National Interagency Aviation Committee

ETC Bulletin 25-001: Retrofitted Hot/Cold Beverage Kits - 2025 Field Season

Date: April 16, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Equipment Technology Committee

Due to spout failures and the associated risk of burn injuries, manufacturers have retrofitted the Hot/Cold Beverage Kits using a heat-shrinking band to secure the black spout at the insertion site. The updated kits feature a fluorescent label on each full kit assembly for easy identification. Catering units are encouraged to confirm the clear heat-shrinking bands are intact around each spout before filling.

ETC Bulletin 24-001 regarding Hot/Cold Beverage Kits has been archived and replaced by ETC Bulletin 25-001 for the 2025 season.

References:

NWCG Alerts

ETC-EB-25-001 Retrofitted Hot/Cold Beverage Kits

NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Chainsaw Operations, PMS 212, and Next Generation Position Task Book for Basic Faller Are Now Available

Date: April 14, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
Hazard Tree and Tree Felling Subcommittee

The updated NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Chainsaw Operations, PMS 212, and NWCG Position Task Book for Basic Faller (FAL3), PMS 311-19 are now available.

The NWCG Standards for Wildland Fire Chainsaw Operations, PMS 212 includes position standards designed to be used in conjunction with the Next Generation Position Task Book (Next Gen PTB). The Next Gen PTB for Basic Faller (FAL3) includes an evaluation guide with suggested rating elements to consider when assessing trainees.

References:

NWCG Standards For Wildland Fire Chainsaw Operations, PMS 212

NWCG Position Task Book for Basic Faller (FAL3), PMS 311-119

NWCG Basic Faller (FAL3)

RMC Memo 25-01: Summary of Updates to Safety Officer Positions

Date: April 9, 2025
Questions?  Please contact:
RMC Member Eric Fransted

The Risk Management Committee (RMC) serves as the position steward for all Safety Officer incident positions and continues to improve position standards, training, and naming conventions. The implementation of Complex Incident Management (CIM) required changes to position titles. RMC collaborated with the NWCG Incident Position Standards Committee (IPSC) to propose and implement these updates. 

References:

RMC Memo 25-01: Summary of Updates to Safety Officer Positions 

NWCG Position Catalog